1 Comment

Love ya KD, but I think you're a tad off here, it's not over, it's just beginning...

1. They seem to be saying current boosters are not a good plan, and they recommend terminating current booster schemes.

2. They seem to be saying NEW boosters need to be made and tailored to variants (or one that covers all future variants).

3. They seem to be saying the current 'boosters' would be better used on the unjabbed... this would mean they've got a plan for them in my eyes... mandates?

I read this as... they will now take the jabs on hand and administer them to the unjabbed, meanwhile creating new jabs for the already jabbed.

I see no admission of anything wrong, only a pivot away from current pokes on hand towards new pokes.

I read this as a strategy to KEEP THIS SHAM GOING. I see this as a press release to spur mandated jabs. I see this as them saying they are going to keep making tailored jabs until the end of time...

The only mention of stopping current plans is replacing it with NEW jabs. There is nothing in this which definitively states no more jabs ever for anyone. In fact, it says the opposite.

Expand full comment