Discover more from The New Christendom Daily
Moore Vs Harper Could Be The Catalyst For A Great Awakening...
Or if decided on the side of The Stacy Slobrams Gang it will be the end of The Constitution sytem
The Upcoming Case of Moore Vs Harper Could Be The Catalyst For A Great Awakening - I will have a complete breakdown of this case of supposed "voting rights" but is ACTUALLY THE REFERENDUM on the survival of [r]epublicanism or its death to Regime, on today's show, you should listen!
I had a most interesting conversation with a close friend on Signal last night. My comments are in italics, his in regular.
What do you think of Moore v Harper?
Hmmmm, not familiar, who's that?
A case in front of the Supremes
Ahhhh, yes, the now infamous "independent state legislature doctrine". Well, as I understand Article I and Article III Moore is completely in the right and the North Carolina SC is completely in the wrong. "The people" of the several states act THROUGH their legislators NOT the courts.
Read Article VII of the Constitution
The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.
The New Christendom Daily is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Read Article V:
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress
It is abundantly clear that where the Constitution refers to "States" it is referring to LEGISLATURES OR bodies convened BY Legislatures
"We The People" is a novelty introduced in the Preamble, it has no force of law. It can be wiped off off the text and it would have no affect whatever
There might be hope here with the Supremes. Unless they threaten them
With ACB on record now against judiciaries overturning state doctrine, she's a safe 4th vote methinks. Roberts knows the same principles I just quoted you, but then again....