Have We Reached Peak Sodomite? No Because We Haven't Admitted Our Porn Addiction.
Apple TV had its first BIG hit until it stuck teenage lesbians into it, why didn't they stick a masturbating porn addict in instead?
My wife and I were really enjoying the AppleTV series “Monarch” until this past Friday when Episode 5 “The Way Out” debuted. In telling the back story of the lead character Cate played by Anna Sawai. When the story shows her on G Day Minus 1, at the school she is a substitute teacher at in San Francisco, we are introduced to the school’s principal whose name is just “Collins”. It is here that Cate and Collins have a spat outside the doors of a school bus filled with children; as I’m watching this argument play out the feeling of dread comes over me and my wife who turns to me, aping Eric Cartman from South Park’s Across The Panderverse:
“Put a chick in it and make her gay!”
I see the same thing and sure enough the spat ends in a tongue exchanging, long kiss. GROSS! But even that’s not enough because now the “couple” are discussing “growing their love” by Cate moving in and shacking up with Collins. CUT! and the next scene shows our heroine lesbian back in the classroom answering 8 year old’s questions about Godzilla when she is interrupted by “Collins” popping here head in the door to wink at Cate and presage the next scene. CUT! and now we see Cate awakening the next morning, naked (of course!) when “Collins” rolls over to inquire if last night’s sex was good. CUT! that sound is me angrily turning off Monarch, Legacy of Lesbians, wondering in which upcoming episode I won’t be watching Godzilla shed a tear and spare the lives of the lesbians after wiping out an entire city of hetero-expendables. The fact that all this Legacy of Lesbians action takes place in San Francisco only adds to my anger and frustration because the entire series of events is completely unrelated to and unnecessary to unraveling the mystery that is Monarch. No, this is pure conditioning of the audiences scrambled brains to the fact that we are at homo saturation. There is nearly nothing on series TV that does not bend a knee to 1.5% of the population that is nearly 100% of the pedo-sex-cult of death.
I know, I know, I hear you, reader: “come on, Mitter Chur, sodomites and flannel shirt wearing lesbians are a part of all our lives, what’s wrong with recognizing their contributions to society!?” In light of that I have a counter claim: where are all the 15-60 year old male characters who have porn addictions, blowup dolls and gallon sized containers of lubricants as mates? They make up over 2/3 of that demographic yet not a one of them is portrayed on the little screen as such. Well, we wouldn’t want anyone to get the idea that promoting and defending the actual sex acts is the agenda here now would we? Oh sure, SataNflix will throw in a hetero sex scene every now and then just to try and pacify the soft-core porn consuming, TV watching public who has now lost all revulsion to witnessing strangers, homo or hetero, “get it on”, but apparently draws the line at wanking!?
But, why!? The public no longer thinks that gambling addiction is a bad thing so why is porn addiction? Indeed, broadcast and streaming TV services now routinely bombard their viewers with celebrities urging them to make bets at FanDuel on sporting events 24-7 so why not show some of the action at PornHub too, viz “order now and we’ll give you your first $20 worth of KY, FREE!”? Could it be that the porn pimps don’t want signs on the interstates like this one, but for porn:
I have been pointing this out for years: people seem to like virtue signaling by approving of the new name given to homosexuality i.e. “gay” and to those who are “gay”; but let him be anathema who even begins a description of the sex acts that “gays” perform, that’s because what used to be called “taboo” was “taboo” for a reason: it’s vile, unnatural and filthy (we should add painful to that list for homosexual men) and “gay” was most assuredly “taboo”. That was then and this is now.
The taboo has been taken to the woodshed, flogged and buried in a time capsule alongside feminine modesty; so, taboo having been erased, “gay” is the new “cool” but the point I’m making here is that it isn’t cool, the fake reality that “love is love” which means levitating Valentine’s day hearts, rainbow colored candies falling from the sky and unicorns flying 2, smiling, nearly naked men about, is. As tens of thousands of parents discovered when their children were exposed by pervert librarians to pedo-pervert Juno Dawson’s “children’s book” This Book Is Gay, male on male sex is the most revolting thing imaginable. Here is page 203 on the subject of “bumming” (I’ve made the image very small so if you really want to see it, click it to open the whole image.)
There’s 6 more pages of this “instruction” all of it equally vile and disgusting; so vile and obscene as a matter of fact, parents have been arrested for violating obscenity laws by reading it aloud at school board meetings. Ok, Mitter Chur, we get it, homo sex is so disgusting most people can’t even hear PG rated descriptions of it but what does that have to do with porn addicts!?
Simple: porn use and subsequent addiction are common among a large majority of men, 25-30 times more men than are homos, so why isn’t porn, as in “porn is love" too”, and it’s addicts, placed as characters in e.g. MONARCH-LEGACY OF WANKERS? Well because it’s still publicly taboo but privately accepted and while most could identify with, who would be quoting lines from Will Smith’s “I am Wanker” or Schwarzenegger’s “Wankinator 2 - Judgement Day”. Seriously, don’t laugh. Porn is one of the worst manners of contraception and one of the most dysphoric of sex disorders. That’s not exactly something dude’s bring to the dinner table if they can find time to turn FanDuel off and eat with their family.
Recently, the damage sexual deviance is causing in all of Western Civilization has become the subject of intense debate and discussion and the focus is primarily on porn. In 2021, A group called Families Are Europe’s Treasure wrote of porn.
Pornography often pretends to be confined to the hidden secret of sexual fantasies. However, even if hidden, pornography heavily impacts a person’s relations with its family, its peers, its community and the entire society overall. The current demographic winter in Europe demonstrates a shift from the true wealth of society – family and children – to the promotion of individualistic short-term happiness. The consumption of pornography is a striking symptom of this change.
The impact of pornography on the individual level is starting to be widely documented. The effects of porn consumption are numerous. It is to begin with a perverse and counterproductive form of sexual education for children and adolescents, who will develop unrealistic, emotionally detached and often violent expectations of sexuality.[1] Pornography is equally problematic for adults, both men and women, with addiction to pornography having disastrous consequences on the psychological balance of its consumers.[2] It also impacts couples, as it rejects the notions of consent, monogamy, stability and occults the profound connection of sexuality with the dignity of human procreation.[3] Moreover, pornography is not only a problem for those who view it, but also a violation of the human dignity of those who participate in it, as the working conditions of porn actors include degrading treatments.[4] More seriously, the porn industry profits from the diffusion of the worst crimes – rape, torture, child abuse – while promoting in a diffuse way a culture of rape, male dominance and sexual selfishness.[5]
However, besides acknowledging the harm that pornography inflicts on the interpersonal relationships, few people consider pornography’s effect on the community, as for example the impact of pornography on demography and the decrease in birth rate. This question was raised early this year in an article of Auguste Meyrat on “The Pornification of Society”.
Meyrat’s essay is a worthy read on the subject and the point he makes is paramount: a society that accepts “gay marriage” as a “good” is one that has divorced the purpose of marriage: to populate the kingdom of God with the (saved) souls of humans; but let’s return back to my original premise, the prominent placement of sodomites and sodomees in movies and broadcast TV series. My contention is that the porn problem is directly linked to the coddling and now promotion of “gay” people. In turn, the “rights” homosexuals have been disastrously “rewarded” have systematically dissolved prior taboos and well taught prohibitions on porn and it’s rotten fruit: self gratification but it wasn’t always this way. I am old enough to remember when Bill Clinton’s Surgeon General, Jocelyn Elders, proclaimed in 1993 that “masturbation was a part of human sexuality and perhaps should be taught in schools from kindergarten through high school”; that Clinton was so embarrassed by Elders’ hubris (imagine that!) that he had to fire her to cool heat coming his way from the Demoncrat party! Again, that was then and this is now.
Pornography and homosexuality are first cousins, both are the products of Satan’s war on human flourishing. I have tried to illustrate herein that the physical practice of homosexuality is so contrary to nature —an nature’s God— and so disgusting and vile that an acceptance of and now outright promotion of it is the safety net under which pornography wages its hi-wire, God (and death) defying war on the family.
In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from it’s Statistical Manual. By 1975, Hollywood, in the firm grip of free-masonic pedo-sex-cultists, already had placed a homo in several series including All In The Family, had a shacked up homo “couple” i a sit-com called “Hot l” (the “e” was missing from the hotel’s neon sign") and homosexuals would become recurring, albeit stereotyped, characters nearly 10 years (1985) before Bruce Willis would lust after “getting horizontal” with Cybil Shepherd on Moonlighting. Thus the gay “march through [entertainment] institutions” presaged the “hookup” pop culture that give a mainstream boost to porn. Now sluts and horndogs are in every corner and every genre of TV. What an irony that the sexual deviants responsible for this slide into an immodesty that will someday be proclaimed to resign Caligula and Pompeii to a status as rank amateurs, homosexuals, now seem to be the only ones pursuing “marriage” and child rearing in that marriage. God does have a sense of humor but he also has infallible moral rules, so don’t fall for it and turn it off when you see it. This is homosexuality being used to soften the landing for and attempt to normalize its ultimate conquest: pederasty. And the first step toward that is already being broadcast: a “family” that lives partly here and partly in Hell led by Lucifer himself and where thinly veiled pedo-jokes abound.
Tell Apple TV you want a “Monarch” in the mold of St. King Louis not an ersatz “queen” a la Harvey Fierstein.
Appendix
TV series that have debuted the last year featuring homosexual leads.
MONARCH LEGACY OF LESBIANS
SURREAL ESTATE
EVE
ONLY MURDER SPOKEN HERE
SHELTER
THE STORY OF US
LIONESS
(please post other series in the comments)
Mike, you often speak my inner voice. I say inner voice because I attend few venues where I can speak out loud. I know your list was new shows, but you could also add old shows that drops the homo-bomb later in their run that made me turn off. Murdoch Mysteries for one!
Mike - Wish you're still on Sirius XM but I get it, things change.
Great article my friend - my wife and I always seem to pick the shows that check every "ESG" block. We haven't started the show and probably will not now - thanks for the heads up.